![]() Clint gets the Soul Stone but has to lose Natasha (which doesn't break the timeline). Related: Every Marvel Movie Releasing After Avengers: Endgame ![]() Of course, that would make for a much less interesting film and is argued away in-universe as requiring characters' knowledge of events. There's a question of why they needed to go to the events of the movies - while the Battle of New York makes sense due to the three Infinity Stone argument, the Aether was in the Collector's museum since Thor: The Dark World and the Power Stone on Xandar following Guardians of the Galaxy, situations with fewer timeline implications. To correct this, the Infinity Stones need to be returned to their original place in the timeline after use. However, removing the Infinity Stones from an earlier point does, creating darker timelines. In short, the Avengers can't change their own timeline as it already happened, so going into the past doesn't affect their own reality. Related: Every Returning Character in Avengers: Endgame While it's possible any change could do this, it's only explicitly stated that it occurs when an Infinity Stone is removed from the timeline, which Bruce proposes can be fixed if they " return each one to its own timeline at the moment it was taken so chronologically, in that reality, it never left." ![]() Remove one of the stones and that flow splits." This suggests that, while the post-Decimation future the Avengers have come from will be there when they return, their actions in the past can impact the timeline to the point that new timelines are created (which, due to the lack of Stones, are much more fraught). Later, when Bruce is attempting to get the Time Stone from the Ancient One, she talks to him and elaborates on his idea further: " The Infinity Stones create what you experience as the flow of time. Even if you were to try and kill baby Thanos, the future you have must be unchanged. Responding to Rhodey's suggestion of killing Thanos in the crib (an adaptation of the " kill Hitler" time travel theory), Bruce dismisses most time travel examples from popular culture ( Back to the Future especially, but Star Trek, Terminator, Time Cop, Time After Time, Quantum Leap, Somewhere In Time, Hot Tub Time Machine and Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure are all mentioned), stating " if you travel to the past, that past becomes your future and your former present becomes the past, which can't now be changed by your new future." The basic implication is that you can't change the past because you've existed in the future no matter what you do, the end result is the same. First is Banner ahead of Hawkeye's test mission. There are two scenes in Avengers: Endgame where time travel is explained. Yes, Mobius strip time travel is a pre-existing idea (it's at the heart of the grandfather paradox), but it's not how the film presents time travel. Of course, Tony Stark's scientific explanation - its perils are rooted in quantum chromodynamics theory, Scott turned into a baby and old man because of the EPR paradox and Deutsch proposition, the wrist devices derive from the eigenvalue of a particle field accounting for spectral decomposition under his Mobius strip configuration - glances with genuine theory but one without any real application. The justification of time travel is fundamental to Avengers: Endgame's second act, with characters repeatedly questioning its possiblity.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |